My wedding day, 15 July 1995, was the best day of my life. Today I am blessed with a wonderful wife and we have 3 great children. I am lucky, and in a statistical minority, to be as happy now as I was on 15 July 1995. I do not take my contentment for granted.
Whilst my wedding day was the best day of my life – it wasn’t the best wedding I’ve attended. It wasn’t even close. This accolade goes to a mate of mine who staged a James Bond themed wedding 5 years ago. Coincidentally, my mate’s wedding also took place on 15 July. To add coincidence to coincidence my mate’s wedding day (and my eleventh wedding anniversary) was also the wedding day of Ashley and Cheryl Cole. Mr and Mrs Cole wed in nearby Barnet.
My mate’s wedding, to be frank, didn’t major on love, commitment or anything else worthy of a solemn vow – but what a bloody great show! When Westlife arrived by helicopter to liven up the bride and groom’s first dance (why should anyone settle for a disco?) there were a few guests giddy and ready to pass out. Luckily the life sized ice sculpture (of the groom – with James Bond) gave some resuscitative value to the proceedings and the swooning masses were soon brought back from the brink to see the groom’s life story broadcast "audio-visually" against the white west wing wall of Henry XIII’s Hertfordshire hunting lodge. The laser show and fireworks could apparently be seen by guests at Cheryl and Ashley’s “lower key” wedding in Barnet....I suspect to the mild irritation of Cheryl, Ashley and OK Magazine.
Those two weddings from 15 July 2006 have both now ended in divorce. Unlike the vast majority of divorces, the financial pots for division in these cases were tailor-made for continued comfort for all concerned.
A similar case, reported by in my local newspaper this week, was that of Victoria Jones (from Gerrards Cross) and Gareth Jones (from a castle near Aberdeen). The Court of Appeal last week awarded Mrs Jones a lump sum of £8,000,000 following her divorce from her husband who had made his fortune in the gas and oil industry. This lump sum was greater than the original sum ordered by the lower court but less than the total sum claimed by Mrs Jones before the Court of Appeal. In making its decision the Court of Appeal drew a distinction between the value of assets that the husband had brought into the marriage and the value of assets that had accrued during the 10 year marriage.
For the very wealthy, the Court of Appeal’s judgment is significant because it gives some endorsement to the “ring-fencing” of pre-marital assets. For the majority of married couples, the decision is of little consequence because all matrimonial assets, irrespective of who acquired and when the assets were acquired, are needed to provide reasonable financial provision for the parties (and any children) going forward.
Historically, the less wealth there has been in a family, the less impact a positive attempt at “ring-fencing” (namely through a pre-nuptial agreement) has had in the eyes of our courts. Whilst “pre-nups” are still not legally binding in this country, the recent Supreme Court decision in the case of Radamacher makes it much more likely that such agreements will be upheld by the family courts, provided certain conditions are met. The issue of whether they should become binding is currently being considered by the Law Commission.
Sadly, most marriages do not last “until death do us part”. However, it is my view (for what it’s worth) that the odds probably increase considerably if vows are not made in the presence of a James Bond lookalike!
Thursday, 3 February 2011
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
They fly so high, nearly reach the sky
This is another non-legal blog. I am fed up with my beloved football team again.
A friend of mine said today: what sort of club leaks a managerial appointment to the press before the new manager has agreed to join?
The short answer to this is West Ham. In the longer answer (which I gave to my mate) I identified my Top Five "it could only happen at West Ham" stories. Mum - I love you dearly, but why oh why did you buy me a West Ham away kit for my third birthday in 1971? What had I done to deserve this pathetic excuse for a football club??
In no particular order:
1. The Paolo Di Canio and Frank Lampard fight on 12 February 2000.
Bradford had been newly promoted to the Premier League. We had a debutant goalkeeper, Stephen Bywater. The poor guy threw 4 goals into his own net. More ridiculously, we scored four ourselves. It was like watching a game between two pub sides....and when we didn't think the farce could deteriorate further, King Paolo had one of his wobbles.. He walked off the pitch with the hump and demanded to be substituted. When Redknapp pushed him back on, he refused to take part in the game. He just sat on the pitch, head down and arms crossed, whilst the game was played around him. His solo boycott ended, after a good two minutes, when the referee blew for a penalty at our end. Paolo was never one to miss a Roy of the Rovers opportunity so, up he got, and sprinted to the penalty spot to prize the ball away from Frank Lampard (Jr - the sh#t one!). Now Frank is big and fat as we know, but he didn't have the strength to out-muscle King Paolo. After quite a few seconds of comedy slapstick, Big Fat Frank turned away with the hump and headed himself towards the dug-out, presumably to moan at his dad (Frank Sr - the good one!). As Fatty trudged away, up stepped the King to stroke home the penalty for a 5-4 home win.
It could only happen at West Ham!
2. Emmanuel Omoyinmi substitution on 15 December 1999
It was our first cup quarter final victory for a decade - or so we thought. Aston Villa came to Upton Park. A cup match under the lights. The fans in the Chicken Run were spitting venom at anything which ran by in a Villa shirt. The whole stadium was absolutely banging. It was 2-2 with less than one minute of extra time to play. Redknapp brought on Emmanuel Omoyinmi as a substituute for someone good (or, if not good, certainly better than Omoyimni). The referee immediately blew for full time to take the game to penalties. Incredibly, West Ham scored all five. Villa scored four. Omoyinmi played no part at all. We were through to the semi fnal - or so we thought. The next day, we were ordered to replay the tie. Emmanuel Omoyinmi had already played in the League Cup that season when he was out on loan. He had forgotten! Our Fixtures Secretary had not thought to make his own enquiries. The game was replayed on 11 January 2000. We lost comfortably.
It could only happen at West Ham!
3. Tevez (and his mate)
I love Carlos Tevez. I can forgive him for creating £26,000,000 in fines which we are still trying to pay and which very nearly did (and still could) lead the club into administration. I loved his mate too. Javier Mascherano's performance against Palermo in the UEFA Cup was probably the best midfield performance I've witnessed at Upton Park since the days of Sir Trevor Brooking. We were all slightly bewildered afterwards when he was dropped. When you have one of the best midfielders in the world (completely unlawfully - and with the illegality threatening to bankrupt the club) it would have been good to see him in a West Ham shirt occasionally...but Pardew knew better apparently! He didn't play Tevez much either (can you have jet lag for 2 months?) but that isn't the point of this tale. For that I must take you to the Club Shop (or Super Store as it's called officially) on the night of said Palermo UEFA Cup fixture. I had to buy 3 Tevez shirts for my kids. When your club is not playing the most expensive footballer in the world (who is with you unlawfully, and who is likely to cause your club's financial collapse) I thought the commercial beast that is WHUFC would want to cash in on a few thousand shirt sales. I wasn't the only person to think this. The queue for Tevez shirts stretched out of the shop, through the gates and half way up Green Street. Imagine our surprize when we heard the (sole!) shirt printer yell out: "If you want Tevez on your back, you might as well turn around because I'm running out of Zs". One of the more patient attendees (there were already punches being thrown to the rear of the shop in between the bouncers and the West Ham babygrows) enquired about the expected delivery date for the new batch of Zs. Imagine our continued surprize when he responded: "Not until next season mate...we buy in bulk once a year...it's cheaper that way." The patient one grew less patient: "Are you having a f#####g laugh? What's the f#####g chance of Tevez being here next year?" When the (sole!) shirt printer retorted with "calm down mate...how do you think Zamora feels?".... it all kicked off in the Club shop. I managed to get two Tevez shirts in the scrum. My daughter had to suffer the indignity of wearing a Mullins shirt for the remainder of the Argentinians' short stay in East London. [She still won't accept that if Mullins had not been suspended for the 2006 Cup Final, he would have been there to close Gerrard down and West Ham would have won its first trophy in 26 years]
It could only happen at West Ham!
4. Glenn Roeder
It's difficult to know where to start here. But as one fellow season ticket holder put it when our team (which included David James, Joe Cole, Michael Carrick, Jermaine Defoe, Trevor Sinclair and Paolo Di Canio) was relegated in 2003: "that pr#ck should be banned from grass".
It could only happen at West Ham!
5. Lee from the Club Shop
In 2004, I was emailed a flyer from the Club Shop encouraging me to order the new home shirt online, by a certain date, to guarantee FREE delivery, to my home, on the day of release, with FREE printing. It was a slick and glossy looking flyer. I knew my kids would be hounding me for the new shirt soon. I liked the sound of FREE delivery. I placed my order for 3 shirts immediately. I diligently included shirt numbers and my kids' names within the order - because that was free too. The day of release came and I left for my office before any post arrived at home. I thought nothing of it. At about midday I received a call which went, word for word, like this:
CALLER: Hello, is this Mr Coyle?
ME: It is, yes.
CALLER: Hello Mr Coyle. It's Lee from the Club Shop.
ME: Oh right yeh...the shirts are coming today aren't they?
LEE: Well that's what I'm calling about Mr Coyle. There's a bit of a problem. I'm sorting it out now and there's a bike waiting outside to deliver....but I just wanted to let you know....(pause)
ME: Let me know what?
LEE: We've run out of numbers - for the kids' sizes anyway.
ME: Right...ok....
LEE: But what I can do is stick numbers which we use for the adult shorts on to your kids' shirts.
ME: Oh right...and that looks ok does it?
LEE: Hold there Mr Coyle...I'll have a quick look....(pause with rustling sound)
LEE: Well, to be honest Mr Coyle...they look a bit sh#t.
ME: Do you have any non-sh#t options Lee?
LEE: Sorry mate....no.
ME: I'll just take the shirts then Lee.
The shirts arrived the next day (a slow bike presumably) with the adult short numbers duly printed on the back of the shirts. Lee hadn't done what I had asked, but he was absolutely right about one thing - the shirts did indeed look sh#t!
It could only happen at West Ham.
Conclusion and pleas
Martin O'Neill: I hope one day that you change your mind and join us in our misery!
Mr Gold and Mr Sullivan: whilst there has probably never been a more fitting pair to run our useless club, please do us all a favour and f#ck off with Lee from the Club Shop.
A friend of mine said today: what sort of club leaks a managerial appointment to the press before the new manager has agreed to join?
The short answer to this is West Ham. In the longer answer (which I gave to my mate) I identified my Top Five "it could only happen at West Ham" stories. Mum - I love you dearly, but why oh why did you buy me a West Ham away kit for my third birthday in 1971? What had I done to deserve this pathetic excuse for a football club??
In no particular order:
1. The Paolo Di Canio and Frank Lampard fight on 12 February 2000.
Bradford had been newly promoted to the Premier League. We had a debutant goalkeeper, Stephen Bywater. The poor guy threw 4 goals into his own net. More ridiculously, we scored four ourselves. It was like watching a game between two pub sides....and when we didn't think the farce could deteriorate further, King Paolo had one of his wobbles.. He walked off the pitch with the hump and demanded to be substituted. When Redknapp pushed him back on, he refused to take part in the game. He just sat on the pitch, head down and arms crossed, whilst the game was played around him. His solo boycott ended, after a good two minutes, when the referee blew for a penalty at our end. Paolo was never one to miss a Roy of the Rovers opportunity so, up he got, and sprinted to the penalty spot to prize the ball away from Frank Lampard (Jr - the sh#t one!). Now Frank is big and fat as we know, but he didn't have the strength to out-muscle King Paolo. After quite a few seconds of comedy slapstick, Big Fat Frank turned away with the hump and headed himself towards the dug-out, presumably to moan at his dad (Frank Sr - the good one!). As Fatty trudged away, up stepped the King to stroke home the penalty for a 5-4 home win.
It could only happen at West Ham!
2. Emmanuel Omoyinmi substitution on 15 December 1999
It was our first cup quarter final victory for a decade - or so we thought. Aston Villa came to Upton Park. A cup match under the lights. The fans in the Chicken Run were spitting venom at anything which ran by in a Villa shirt. The whole stadium was absolutely banging. It was 2-2 with less than one minute of extra time to play. Redknapp brought on Emmanuel Omoyinmi as a substituute for someone good (or, if not good, certainly better than Omoyimni). The referee immediately blew for full time to take the game to penalties. Incredibly, West Ham scored all five. Villa scored four. Omoyinmi played no part at all. We were through to the semi fnal - or so we thought. The next day, we were ordered to replay the tie. Emmanuel Omoyinmi had already played in the League Cup that season when he was out on loan. He had forgotten! Our Fixtures Secretary had not thought to make his own enquiries. The game was replayed on 11 January 2000. We lost comfortably.
It could only happen at West Ham!
3. Tevez (and his mate)
I love Carlos Tevez. I can forgive him for creating £26,000,000 in fines which we are still trying to pay and which very nearly did (and still could) lead the club into administration. I loved his mate too. Javier Mascherano's performance against Palermo in the UEFA Cup was probably the best midfield performance I've witnessed at Upton Park since the days of Sir Trevor Brooking. We were all slightly bewildered afterwards when he was dropped. When you have one of the best midfielders in the world (completely unlawfully - and with the illegality threatening to bankrupt the club) it would have been good to see him in a West Ham shirt occasionally...but Pardew knew better apparently! He didn't play Tevez much either (can you have jet lag for 2 months?) but that isn't the point of this tale. For that I must take you to the Club Shop (or Super Store as it's called officially) on the night of said Palermo UEFA Cup fixture. I had to buy 3 Tevez shirts for my kids. When your club is not playing the most expensive footballer in the world (who is with you unlawfully, and who is likely to cause your club's financial collapse) I thought the commercial beast that is WHUFC would want to cash in on a few thousand shirt sales. I wasn't the only person to think this. The queue for Tevez shirts stretched out of the shop, through the gates and half way up Green Street. Imagine our surprize when we heard the (sole!) shirt printer yell out: "If you want Tevez on your back, you might as well turn around because I'm running out of Zs". One of the more patient attendees (there were already punches being thrown to the rear of the shop in between the bouncers and the West Ham babygrows) enquired about the expected delivery date for the new batch of Zs. Imagine our continued surprize when he responded: "Not until next season mate...we buy in bulk once a year...it's cheaper that way." The patient one grew less patient: "Are you having a f#####g laugh? What's the f#####g chance of Tevez being here next year?" When the (sole!) shirt printer retorted with "calm down mate...how do you think Zamora feels?".... it all kicked off in the Club shop. I managed to get two Tevez shirts in the scrum. My daughter had to suffer the indignity of wearing a Mullins shirt for the remainder of the Argentinians' short stay in East London. [She still won't accept that if Mullins had not been suspended for the 2006 Cup Final, he would have been there to close Gerrard down and West Ham would have won its first trophy in 26 years]
It could only happen at West Ham!
4. Glenn Roeder
It's difficult to know where to start here. But as one fellow season ticket holder put it when our team (which included David James, Joe Cole, Michael Carrick, Jermaine Defoe, Trevor Sinclair and Paolo Di Canio) was relegated in 2003: "that pr#ck should be banned from grass".
It could only happen at West Ham!
5. Lee from the Club Shop
In 2004, I was emailed a flyer from the Club Shop encouraging me to order the new home shirt online, by a certain date, to guarantee FREE delivery, to my home, on the day of release, with FREE printing. It was a slick and glossy looking flyer. I knew my kids would be hounding me for the new shirt soon. I liked the sound of FREE delivery. I placed my order for 3 shirts immediately. I diligently included shirt numbers and my kids' names within the order - because that was free too. The day of release came and I left for my office before any post arrived at home. I thought nothing of it. At about midday I received a call which went, word for word, like this:
CALLER: Hello, is this Mr Coyle?
ME: It is, yes.
CALLER: Hello Mr Coyle. It's Lee from the Club Shop.
ME: Oh right yeh...the shirts are coming today aren't they?
LEE: Well that's what I'm calling about Mr Coyle. There's a bit of a problem. I'm sorting it out now and there's a bike waiting outside to deliver....but I just wanted to let you know....(pause)
ME: Let me know what?
LEE: We've run out of numbers - for the kids' sizes anyway.
ME: Right...ok....
LEE: But what I can do is stick numbers which we use for the adult shorts on to your kids' shirts.
ME: Oh right...and that looks ok does it?
LEE: Hold there Mr Coyle...I'll have a quick look....(pause with rustling sound)
LEE: Well, to be honest Mr Coyle...they look a bit sh#t.
ME: Do you have any non-sh#t options Lee?
LEE: Sorry mate....no.
ME: I'll just take the shirts then Lee.
The shirts arrived the next day (a slow bike presumably) with the adult short numbers duly printed on the back of the shirts. Lee hadn't done what I had asked, but he was absolutely right about one thing - the shirts did indeed look sh#t!
It could only happen at West Ham.
Conclusion and pleas
Martin O'Neill: I hope one day that you change your mind and join us in our misery!
Mr Gold and Mr Sullivan: whilst there has probably never been a more fitting pair to run our useless club, please do us all a favour and f#ck off with Lee from the Club Shop.
Punishing Pot-holes
This morning I suffered road-rage for the first time in 2011. I was driving past the local primary school when, from nowhere, some sort of monster truck took a monster swerve around an innocuous looking pot-hole into my path.
The vehicle was being driven by a young and very attractive mum who had obviously dropped her little one at school in preference to letting him/her walk a few hundred yards (I’m guessing!) in the drizzle.
This pot-hole evasion manoeuvre almost caused me to crash into some adjacent railings. It did cause my de-caf skinny latte (January de-tox!) to break loose from my Costa plastic cup, through that irritating cap-hole at the top (the thing that makes you slurp) and into my lap.
As coffee soaked into my new Christmas underpants, my first thought was this: surely that sub-aqua, desert storming, cliff climbing tank of a vehicle is capable of running one of its wheels over a pot-hole? I didn’t dwell on this thought for long (the beautiful driver smiled apologetically at me) so I queried this instead: why on earth, credit crunch or not, do we taxpayers have to put up with roads which belong in a long gone Soviet eastern bloc type era?
So what is the law relating to pot-holes? Well the starting point, believe it or not, is the Domesday Book. This records that “if anyone makes a fence or a ditch by which the King’s public way is narrowed....for each offence of this sort he shall pay 100 shillings to the King”. The Statute of Winchester 1555 then required property dwellers with road frontages to wash their street. The Statute specified the number of water buckets to use and the washing frequency!
Moving from the nostalgia of medieval Britain to modern times, the statutory duty of maintenance now falls upon the relevant “Highway Authority” (in essence, your Local Authority). This is imposed by Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980. The same statute gives local authorities a limited defence under Section 58. Under this provision, the local authority has to demonstrate that it has taken “reasonable care to secure that the part of the highway to which the action relates was not dangerous to traffic”. The question of what constitutes reasonable care is generally referenced to nationally recommended standards for highway maintenance which can be found at www.roadcodes.org
With the recent flurry of snow causing last year’s hastily fixed pot-holes to reappear and breed (and with a reducing pot of money to carry out essential road maintenance) local authorities and motor insurers are being swamped with compensation claims.
If your car has been damaged by a pot-hole, and you put your claim to the local authority, expect your demand for compensation to be met by a Section 58 defence. If you need assistance in trying to knock down this hurdle, I may be able to help, unless you’re the person who nearly crashed into me this morning - you owe me a coffee!
Friday, 31 December 2010
Twitter off to Galway
It's New Year's Eve (again) so here is my last blog of 2010. Full of Christmas cheer and without having thought of work for over a week, this blog, unashamedly, has absolutely nothing to do with the law. It is a tale from 2010 about deep technical despair but even deeper contentment arising from my favourite hobby: travel. It was a tale that leapt into my mind when trying to install by kids' Xbox Kinnect on Christmas Day. I love Father Christmas as much as the next man...but delivering the presents, frankly, is the easy bit!
It was on a day in mid September that I went to bed feeling particulary irritable and exhausted. I felt really old. This must have been how my gran felt, I thought, when her bank sent a cashpoint card in 1987. I remember having to go on the bus with her to Harrow to impart my youthful experience of such things. She was the strongest person I’d ever met in my life, but I felt so sorry for her that day – unable to cope with technological change; a new-age incompetent.
In fairness to my dear old gran, she’d taken 71 years to reach this depressing moment of acknowledgment (I suspect in everyone’s life) that the tools of life are moving too quickly for us to catch them up. Within those 71 years, she’d witnessed the switch from horse and cart to motor car. She’d witnessed the switch from propeller planes to commercial jet airliners. She’d witnessed the still more staggering developments in flight technology which saw men being shot up to the moon for goodness sake. Why then at just 41, I thought solemnly, had I also become a new–age incompetent; a technophobe? Why had I becoming isolated from the rest of society? When, I thought, had I become such a complete and utter loser?
That day had started badly. I needed to be away at 6am for a training seminar. The Law Society require all solicitors to undertake "Continuing Professional Development" which creates few great lawyers but, presumably, makes somebody lots of money. Unfortunately the alarm on my new mobile didn’t ring. It was an iPhone chosen by my 10 year old son. He’d set a new ring tone (Hersham Boys by Sham 69) within 3 minutes of the thing coming out of the box. I had a photo of Paulo Di Canio as my IPhone “wallpaper” inside 10 minutes. He then took a video of his 6 year old sister pretending to be Lady Gaga and competed in the Olympics against his cousin (resident 6 miles away!) before boredom finally set in. If only I’d got him to set the poxy alarm!
In my car 2 hours later at 8am, I frantically stabbed and fumbled with my wife’s TomTom. But could I get to the post code entry screen as explained so nonchalantly to me the night before? No I bloody couldn’t. Nor could I even get the device to stay stuck to the dashboard. Between my home and my training seminar in deepest Deptford, the device fell into the crutch of my trousers 6 times. To add insult to injury, these were the only occasions when the bloody thing spoke to me.
These periodic TomTom blows to my midriff did nothing to abate my anger, nor reduce my blood pressure. Throughout my road rage the new iPhone vibrated half a dozen times in my pocket. Each time a “bluetooth disabled” command roared from the central console of my dashboard. I stopped at a lay by with a view to asking my son what a blue tooth was and how it could help me in life. Despite more erratic poking, I couldn’t even get the phone to make a call. I couldn’t see a green phone sign on that plasma screen for love nor money.
On arrival I sprinted to the sound of sirens through the reception area towards a conference room marked “meeting in progress”. I was pulled back by a security guard wielding a large plastic probe. I thought my gonads had been given enough attention by my wife’s TomTom - but that was wishful thinking.
As I emptied by pockets I could see that my iPhone was showing 16 missed calls. “But I haven’t heard Sham 69 once this morning, for f##k sake” I wailed to myself in despair. “Keep that vulgarity to yourself” responded the security guard as he poked his bleeping probe into the small of my back. “You’re not on Facebook now” he added.
“What the f##k is Facebook?” was all I could muster before being escorted out of the building in a half nelson.
When I got back to the office, an irritating junior colleague asked whether the seminar had been presented via “Power Point” or “Keynote”. I shrugged and just said “Who cares?” before going to my office, ringing my wife and begging her for an immediate holiday. Two forgotten internet passwords and a pint of lager later, I was in town taking the old-school “see a travel agent” option. It seemed preferable to navigating through Google, buyacheapflight.com, donotusebuyacheapflight.com and doyoufeeluselessyet.com – where I would inevitably lose my credit card details and personal ID to some clever little sod in Nairobi
To be fair to the travel agent, he threw me back on a road towards salvation. After unleashing my technological woes upon him and expressing my urgent need for peace, he told me I needed to go to the West of Ireland …to Galway , specifically, for the International Oyster Festival.
So it was to Galway that I flew, with my wife, the day following those sullen thoughts about technological advances and my gran’s descent from greatness.
We flew with the little known Aer Arann from Luton . The plane had propellers on each wing. I had never been on such an antiquated plane but, peculiarly, I found the little propellers quite comforting as we spluttered across the Irish Sea .
On arrival at Galway airport we discovered that flights were incoming but temporarily not outgoing. There was apparently a very dangerous oil slick on the runway. There was a fire engine on hand but sitting idle along with its crew. They all watched as 3 men in luminous jackets took it in turns to brush away the oil with a large broom.
As a consequence of the oil spill, the departure lounge was heaving. To my surprise (but helping the process by which tranquility, as a concept, was becoming reunited with my aching brain) there wasn’t an ounce of stress to be seen. Some played cards; others drank Guinness; most were just talking and laughing. There was not a phone or a laptop anywhere
.
“I’m going to like it here” I told my wife as we queued for a taxi.
Unfortunately our cab then ran out of petrol a mile out of the airport. It was like water off a duck’s back to the driver – and by then to me as well. “That’ll be the children again - driving here, there and feckin everywhere without asking me….Still, serves me right for all those impure thoughts, eh?”
He had no phone to call for assistance. As he started to walk up the road with a green plastic container from his boot, he shouted back that the gaelic football club 2 fields across would be a decent way to spend some of the afternoon. “When God invented time, he made plenty of it - so enjoy the craic and I’ll pick you up in a bit. The oysters will still be there tomorrow!” We followed our orders.
Three hours (and a very exciting match) later our cabbie arrived back. He appeared to be with his wife. He was fully suited and booted. The pair were clearly both there for a good night out. I caught our driver’s eye as he marched to the bar. “Jesus, Mary and Joseph, I forgot all about you – I must get you both a pint now.” He then turned slowly to his wife: “For f##k’s sake I forgot to fill the cab up too.”
“You’ve a head like a colander” mused his wife “only not as useful” she continued. “I wondered what you were doing with the petrol can when you came in” she concluded, her husband nodding to give full acknowledgement to his own ineptitude.
“We’ll get you a ride to your digs after I’ve told you the one about the four nuns at the farmyard….” said our errant taxi driver before proceeding to tell us every joke in his repertoire. Time became lost after that. We drank loads but we laughed loads more.
By midnight we were on the football field learning the art of gaelic football with a cabbage…and between 1am and 3am we were back inside the clubhouse dancing to the Pogues and singing to U2. All in all it was indeed a great craic!
The next morning we awoke in our B&B to the smell of bacon. The bacon was accompanied by eggs collected from the backyard that morning by the owner’s daughter. I had 3 mugs of tea to wash it all down – and it was heavenly.
Immediately after breakfast we were collected by our new friends from the night before.
“Still no taxi, but it’s ok, we’ll walk to Morans in Kilcolgan – it’ll do us all the power of good."
Kilcolgan meant nothing to me, but after seven miles of wind in our faces and sun on our heads, we were there, by a weir, picking oysters from their shells and supping the creamiest Guinness within God’s creation.
The walk had been invigorating; the company enthralling; our destination both charming and reinvigorating in equal measure. I felt alive again…and at no disadvantage at all for the absence of a tweet. My wife sent a text to our son from the weir side: “C U L8er my luv. dad says iphone is yours. he luvs u 2!”
So if you nothing else in 2011, get yourself to Galway. Happy New Year!!
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Sweating and Squatting
A recently published guide, issued by the Ministry of Justice, is intended to thwart the insurgence of squatters upon our private property. Housing Minister, Grant Shapps, has roused us all into stopping “anti-social, undesirable and unfair practice”. Very well said Minister...but do you know that these anti-social undesirables can make lots of money from these unfair practices too?
A client of mine gave me a flyer last week which advertised the following key features to an event:
For a very brief moment, I felt ecstatic (no pun intended) by my client’s gift: I thought I was being invited to a “do”. Unfortunately, the pained expression on my client’s face, plus the fact it was office hours and I was in my suit, made me realise that I was being asked to do something legal. My initial ecstasy immediately dampened. I think, youth of today, that this is called “a downer”.
· The venue for a 3-day rave (my client’s commercial warehouse!)
· The time the rave started and finished (9.00pm on Friday night right through to 5.00am the following Monday!)
· The price for entry to the rave (£10 per raver!)
· The names of five “disc jockeys” (not called this on the flyer, but I am the nostalgic sort... there is plenty of nostalgia to follow!) brought in to keep the raving masses entertained.
Now for the nostalgic section.....
In 1987 I attended my first rave. I call it that very loosely. It was a lawfully arranged “soul weekender” at the Prestatyn site of Pontins (tragically now in Administration!). I went with some school mates, Paul Prokopiou and Dave Scourfield. Prok danced (principally to Alexander O’Neill, Luther Vandross and Barry White) for 72 hours. Dave drank Stella Artois with Crème de Menthe chasers for 72 hours. I tried a cheeky combo of these two activities for 72 hours. Hour 73 was no picnic for any of us! I had my first bout of alcohol poisoning; Prok had very sore groins and calves; Dave, bless him, started on the road to nowhere which he paced with liver pickling conviction for the next 17 years of his life.
The Soul Boys returned to Amersham in a mess and a month later I began my law degree at Manchester University. Reasonably fresh from the Prestatyn soul weekender, I attended the much publicised Hacienda Club during my first week in Manchester. It had not, as it turned out, been publicised quite enough in Amersham! Dave Smith (my new mate) dressed up in a suit and tie (á la Rick Astley) and I naively followed (the) suit. For those of you who remember The Hacienda in 1987, we had clearly made some schoolboy errors when choosing our clobber for the big night. The bouncers should not have allowed us entry, but they obviously felt teased into the possibility of some Rick Astley-style dancing to “Pump up the Volume”. Tragically, the bouncers weren’t disappointed. Dave and I were ejected before midnight.
A month later still, another mate from home came up to visit. I need to preserve his anonymity in this blog. What I can say is that (a) he dressed like a proper raver (from memory he brought Kickers back into fashion in 1987 after a 3 year leave of absence from the fashion industry) (b) he had hair like a proper raver (c) he took mind distorting drugs like a proper raver (d) he danced like a proper raver and, as a consequence of all the above (e) everyone in the Hacienda and Ibiza-wide absolutely loved him.
A few years later at my wedding the same friend was still raving and was still the centre of attention – or certainly just left of centre next to my wonderful wife. Sadly (and the reason for preserving his anonymity here) my friend also caught the attention of 3 constables from the Thames Valley Police Force following an ugly residents’ bar incident at about 3am. The involvement of the Merseyside Constabulary, arising from the same ugly incident, needs to wait for another blog because I feel myself going off course. Long story short: the “boyish high jinx” (as it has been classified by my raving “mad” mate) which created a duel force police investigation into my wedding night was, in hindsight, the result of 80s and 90s rave/drug culture.
Nowadays, simply the thought of spending 3 full days in a drum and base thumping warehouse makes me feel physically sick. If I’m honest, the prospect of 3 days in Prestatyn doesn’t fill me with love either. I’m pretty sure my Hacienda loving mate, now in his forties, would still be “lovin it, lovin it lovin it” (as the youth of today might say – must check with my “in tune” teenage nephew!) but, being firmly on the side of the righteous and the good, here’s a bit of law on this subject to help landowning victims of sweating and squatting revellers – sadly I had to get here in the end!
- For “permanent” squatters, expedited possession proceedings (approximately a 7 day turnaround from application to court order and, where necessary, bailiff eviction) are available specifically to deal with “unknown persons” in occupation of residential or commercial premises. The legal costs (sadly irrecoverable because there are no “named” defendants to enforce an order for costs against) will be in the region of £3,500 all inclusive.
- More appealing, if (like my client) you have found a flyer post-party giving the names of some DJs, you can apply for something called a Norwich Pharmacal Order which will compel a named DJ to identify the names of the actual rave organiser(s).
- Now with named defendants, via the Norwich Pharmacal route, you can bring a claim for damages against the organisers for trespass, criminal damage and, best still, for an account of all profits made by the trespassers, on your land, from their event. With thousands of sweating bodies regularly converging on mass at these venues, at £10 a head minimum, the arithmetic is easy!
If you have recently been a victim of this highly organised crime, please feel free to contact me, Sian Nath or Jackie Revell through our website (www.cwd-law.com)
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
Private Wheel Clamping
One of the things I really hate is private wheel clamping. Well boys, your days are numbered!
Next month (November 2010) sees the Freedom Bill begin its passage through Parliament. If its passage through the Commons and the Lords is successful, it will be unlawful to implement any clamping operation on privately owned land. So it will be good riddance to the hired thugs who charge £150 for the release of a wheel clamp installed (usually as you approach your vehicle) just moments earlier - and who then extort another £150 from you for the 5 minutes it takes for you to return from a cashpoint machine!
I recently helped a client who was clamped, whilst sitting in his car, with the engine still running, next to his 18 month old baby strapped into her baby seat! Dad and daughter were waiting for wife and mum to exit the adjacent chemists with every parents' favourite recreational drug: Calpol. My client came to me £470 poorer than when he turned his left indicator towards the gaping and alluring space by the (apparently private) kerb.
But what can we do now when faced with intimidating demands for obscene amounts of money from the fat boys in luminous jackets?
Well the starting point is to require sight of the clamper's written authority to clamp. To become a licenced private wheel clamper, you need more than a warped desire to cause people distress and misery - you need, amongst other things, to abide by Clause 6 of the British Parking Association Approved Operator Scheme Code of Practice. This regulatory little beauty requires you to have written authority from the private landowner where you are operating. When you are near shops or similar (ie where parking would appear to be an uncontroversial thing to try!) you might well find that, whilst the clamper has a written authority from "somebody," it is really just a "nobody" - in the legal and "property owning" sense.
If handing over cash is the better immediate alternative to arguing about the rights and wrongs of the Clause 6 authority, then don't despair. You or your solicitor can write to the clamping company after the event to ask for the written authority from the landowner. I suggest you do this under threat of an application for something called Pre-Action Disclosure (for the legal anoraks amongst us, see Part 31.14 of the Civil Procedure Rules...taken best with a very large brandy!)
If the clamping company refuses to co-operate with your reasonable written request, the Court will often Order that the disclosure of the key document be accompanied by a cheque to reimburse legal costs! That always feels good.
For a better feeling still (if through this process you discover that there is no valid authority for the particular piece of land you were parked upon) advertise locally for other victims of the same scam and bring a group action to recover all of the money improperly extorted during the clampers fleeting but highly profitable visit to your town.
If the Freedom Bill becomes law, then old fashioned "no parking" signals will come back into vogue - like the building of walls and the erection of gates. If however, before that day comes, you would like help in tackling some luminous jackets, then please contact me via our website: http://www.cwd-law.com/.
Next month (November 2010) sees the Freedom Bill begin its passage through Parliament. If its passage through the Commons and the Lords is successful, it will be unlawful to implement any clamping operation on privately owned land. So it will be good riddance to the hired thugs who charge £150 for the release of a wheel clamp installed (usually as you approach your vehicle) just moments earlier - and who then extort another £150 from you for the 5 minutes it takes for you to return from a cashpoint machine!
I recently helped a client who was clamped, whilst sitting in his car, with the engine still running, next to his 18 month old baby strapped into her baby seat! Dad and daughter were waiting for wife and mum to exit the adjacent chemists with every parents' favourite recreational drug: Calpol. My client came to me £470 poorer than when he turned his left indicator towards the gaping and alluring space by the (apparently private) kerb.
But what can we do now when faced with intimidating demands for obscene amounts of money from the fat boys in luminous jackets?
Well the starting point is to require sight of the clamper's written authority to clamp. To become a licenced private wheel clamper, you need more than a warped desire to cause people distress and misery - you need, amongst other things, to abide by Clause 6 of the British Parking Association Approved Operator Scheme Code of Practice. This regulatory little beauty requires you to have written authority from the private landowner where you are operating. When you are near shops or similar (ie where parking would appear to be an uncontroversial thing to try!) you might well find that, whilst the clamper has a written authority from "somebody," it is really just a "nobody" - in the legal and "property owning" sense.
If handing over cash is the better immediate alternative to arguing about the rights and wrongs of the Clause 6 authority, then don't despair. You or your solicitor can write to the clamping company after the event to ask for the written authority from the landowner. I suggest you do this under threat of an application for something called Pre-Action Disclosure (for the legal anoraks amongst us, see Part 31.14 of the Civil Procedure Rules...taken best with a very large brandy!)
If the clamping company refuses to co-operate with your reasonable written request, the Court will often Order that the disclosure of the key document be accompanied by a cheque to reimburse legal costs! That always feels good.
For a better feeling still (if through this process you discover that there is no valid authority for the particular piece of land you were parked upon) advertise locally for other victims of the same scam and bring a group action to recover all of the money improperly extorted during the clampers fleeting but highly profitable visit to your town.
If the Freedom Bill becomes law, then old fashioned "no parking" signals will come back into vogue - like the building of walls and the erection of gates. If however, before that day comes, you would like help in tackling some luminous jackets, then please contact me via our website: http://www.cwd-law.com/.
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
Fish Fatalities & Fitness For Purpose
I was in the pub on Saturday and my mate was moaning. His wife had bought a hair dryer which he thought was too hot. His wife was happy with her purchase but my (balding) mate had suffered what he described as a serious “melting injury” in his rush to get ready for the pub. My mate has always been prone to theatrics. When we played football as kids he had a season ticket in the St John’s Ambulance. He was a total embarrassment to his poor dad, who was regarded locally as the hardest footballer ever to walk the earth. My mate had an awful lot to live up to – and, in all honesty, he didn’t!
His severe melting injury manifested itself as very mild “redness” to the crown of his bald head. He said he was going to take the hair dryer back because it was not “fit for purpose”. I could tell he’d been reading the Citizens Advice Bureau website again so I tried to get his (red) head straight.
As a local lawyer, I’m often asked to explain legal concepts in the pub. In my experience, people hate paying lawyers, so if you can get your knowledge, for free, on a Saturday night and avoid asking any questions between 9 and 5, Monday to Friday, you’ve had great result.
I explained the position to my mate like this. Under consumer law, you have a statutory right to reject any goods, bought in a shop, which are not fit for the purpose for which they were sold. If you buy something in a shop which is not “fit for purpose”, you are entitled to a full refund, providing the problem is brought to the shop keeper’s attention within a reasonable time – and you have not done anything which would reasonably be construed as showing your acceptance of the goods: using the hairdryer every day, for example, or perhaps smashing it up!
I explained, as nicely as I could, that a hairdryer which pumps out hot air to dry hair would seem (in my eyes at least) to be pretty “spot on” in terms of functionality. I had my work cut out though. He’s a hard guy to please. This was the mate who criticized Nelson Mandela for falling short on his economic policy after bringing the apartheid regime to an end. “It’s not as if he’s had no time on his hands” was how he assessed Nelson’s shortcomings. I persevered by telling him about my daughter’s fish....a very sorry tale indeed.
In the summer, when I disappeared to watch England’s embarrassing attempt to win the FIFA World Cup, I left my daughter in charge of the fish. She promised to feed Tommy (a goldfish) and Midge (type unknown...but it was really little!) every single day. I gave my wife a supervisory role in case my daughter “fell short”, Nelson Mandela style. Well to cut this part of the story short, mum and daughter both let themselves down and when I returned from my trip, Tommy had eaten Midge in preference to starving to death himself.
“But what’s this got to do with fitness for purpose?” my pal asked . We were close to last orders and his fear of running over into the “charging zone” was palpable.
I explained that in a fit of guilt, my wife had sent me and our girl down to the pet shop to buy some presents for Tommy; basically some new gravel (lucky boy!) and anything else which took our fancy. What took my daughter’s fancy was a little fishy pergola and a little clay model of an open jawed Moby Dick. She was delighted with her purchases, but forgot all about the fish again once we were home and everything was in the tank.
I was a bit nervous about Tommy’s immediate reaction to Moby, but he seemed to calm down a bit the following day and all was well again in fish world.
To my horror though, when I went to feed Tommy before work on Monday morning, he was nowhere to be seen. The tank was fish- free! After I’d checked my wife’s movements (she hadn’t fished out the fish) I had a ridiculous conversation with our decorator who was the only other person present and capable of fishnapping. If I’m honest, he seemed a bit affronted, and certainly very surprised, by my line of questioning. In hindsight, he definitely had the moral high ground: what self respecting decorator would steal a very old fish?
It was only in the evening, when I was following up on my wife’s theory that dead fish don’t always float, but sometimes bury themselves in gravel (I know....ridculous!) that I made a gruesome finding. As I accidentally nudged Moby Dick onto its side, I saw Tommy’s orange body lodged fairly, squarely and very uncomfortably into the base of the model. Moby Dick, the new fish toy, had eaten Tommy the fish. Now that, I pronounced, is what can properly be described, in a legal sense, as “not fit for purpose”....a fish eating fish toy!
My rather uncharitable mate finished his pint with the following words: “ Well I have to say I think Tommy got exactly what he deserved ” . He had a point.
Next week’s blog takes me to Amersham fair (for replacement fish) and to the thorny legal issue of private wheel clamping...watch this space!
His severe melting injury manifested itself as very mild “redness” to the crown of his bald head. He said he was going to take the hair dryer back because it was not “fit for purpose”. I could tell he’d been reading the Citizens Advice Bureau website again so I tried to get his (red) head straight.
As a local lawyer, I’m often asked to explain legal concepts in the pub. In my experience, people hate paying lawyers, so if you can get your knowledge, for free, on a Saturday night and avoid asking any questions between 9 and 5, Monday to Friday, you’ve had great result.
I explained the position to my mate like this. Under consumer law, you have a statutory right to reject any goods, bought in a shop, which are not fit for the purpose for which they were sold. If you buy something in a shop which is not “fit for purpose”, you are entitled to a full refund, providing the problem is brought to the shop keeper’s attention within a reasonable time – and you have not done anything which would reasonably be construed as showing your acceptance of the goods: using the hairdryer every day, for example, or perhaps smashing it up!
I explained, as nicely as I could, that a hairdryer which pumps out hot air to dry hair would seem (in my eyes at least) to be pretty “spot on” in terms of functionality. I had my work cut out though. He’s a hard guy to please. This was the mate who criticized Nelson Mandela for falling short on his economic policy after bringing the apartheid regime to an end. “It’s not as if he’s had no time on his hands” was how he assessed Nelson’s shortcomings. I persevered by telling him about my daughter’s fish....a very sorry tale indeed.
In the summer, when I disappeared to watch England’s embarrassing attempt to win the FIFA World Cup, I left my daughter in charge of the fish. She promised to feed Tommy (a goldfish) and Midge (type unknown...but it was really little!) every single day. I gave my wife a supervisory role in case my daughter “fell short”, Nelson Mandela style. Well to cut this part of the story short, mum and daughter both let themselves down and when I returned from my trip, Tommy had eaten Midge in preference to starving to death himself.
“But what’s this got to do with fitness for purpose?” my pal asked . We were close to last orders and his fear of running over into the “charging zone” was palpable.
I explained that in a fit of guilt, my wife had sent me and our girl down to the pet shop to buy some presents for Tommy; basically some new gravel (lucky boy!) and anything else which took our fancy. What took my daughter’s fancy was a little fishy pergola and a little clay model of an open jawed Moby Dick. She was delighted with her purchases, but forgot all about the fish again once we were home and everything was in the tank.
I was a bit nervous about Tommy’s immediate reaction to Moby, but he seemed to calm down a bit the following day and all was well again in fish world.
To my horror though, when I went to feed Tommy before work on Monday morning, he was nowhere to be seen. The tank was fish- free! After I’d checked my wife’s movements (she hadn’t fished out the fish) I had a ridiculous conversation with our decorator who was the only other person present and capable of fishnapping. If I’m honest, he seemed a bit affronted, and certainly very surprised, by my line of questioning. In hindsight, he definitely had the moral high ground: what self respecting decorator would steal a very old fish?
It was only in the evening, when I was following up on my wife’s theory that dead fish don’t always float, but sometimes bury themselves in gravel (I know....ridculous!) that I made a gruesome finding. As I accidentally nudged Moby Dick onto its side, I saw Tommy’s orange body lodged fairly, squarely and very uncomfortably into the base of the model. Moby Dick, the new fish toy, had eaten Tommy the fish. Now that, I pronounced, is what can properly be described, in a legal sense, as “not fit for purpose”....a fish eating fish toy!
My rather uncharitable mate finished his pint with the following words: “ Well I have to say I think Tommy got exactly what he deserved ” . He had a point.
Next week’s blog takes me to Amersham fair (for replacement fish) and to the thorny legal issue of private wheel clamping...watch this space!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)